Lead qualification is the process that separates successful sales teams from ones that waste time chasing bad-fit prospects. But the landscape has changed dramatically since IBM introduced BANT in the 1960s. Is this classic framework still relevant, or is it time for something new?
In this deep dive, we'll explore BANT, its modern alternatives, and help you choose the right qualification framework for your sales process.
Understanding BANT
BANT: The Classic Framework
BANT stands for:
- Budget: Does the prospect have budget allocated for this purchase?
- Authority: Are you speaking with the decision-maker?
- Need: Does the prospect have a clear need for your solution?
- Timeline: When are they looking to make a decision?
BANT was revolutionary for its time. It gave sales teams a simple, memorable checklist to qualify leads. But the B2B buying process has evolved significantly since the 1960s.
Why BANT Falls Short in 2025
Several factors make BANT less effective today:
- Buying committees: The average B2B purchase now involves 6-10 decision makers. "Authority" is distributed, not centralized.
- Budget flexibility: Modern companies can create budget for compelling solutions. Leading with "Do you have budget?" can disqualify otherwise great opportunities.
- Buyer education: Prospects do 70% of their research before talking to sales. They may not articulate "need" in traditional terms.
- Seller-centric focus: BANT focuses on what the seller needs to know, not what the buyer is experiencing.
Modern Qualification Frameworks
MEDDIC
Originally developed at PTC, MEDDIC is popular in enterprise sales:
- Metrics: What economic impact does the prospect expect?
- Economic Buyer: Who has final budget authority?
- Decision Criteria: What factors will drive their decision?
- Decision Process: How do they make purchasing decisions?
- Identify Pain: What specific problem are they solving?
- Champion: Who inside the organization will advocate for you?
GPCTBA/C&I
HubSpot's framework focuses on the buyer's journey:
- Goals: What are the prospect's goals?
- Plans: What plans do they have to achieve those goals?
- Challenges: What obstacles are in their way?
- Timeline: When do they need to achieve these goals?
- Budget: What resources can they allocate?
- Authority: Who's involved in the decision?
- Consequences & Implications: What happens if they don't achieve their goals?
CHAMP
A buyer-centric reordering of qualification priorities:
- Challenges: Start with their problems, not your needs
- Authority: Understand the decision-making structure
- Money: Discuss investment in context of value
- Prioritization: Where does this rank among their initiatives?
Framework Comparison
| Framework | Best For | Complexity | Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| BANT | Simple sales, small deals | Low | Seller |
| MEDDIC | Enterprise, complex sales | High | Process |
| GPCTBA/C&I | Inbound, consultative sales | Medium | Buyer |
| CHAMP | SMB, solution selling | Low | Buyer |
Choosing the Right Framework
The best framework depends on your sales motion:
- High-volume, transactional sales: A simplified version of BANT or CHAMP works well. Speed matters more than depth.
- Mid-market with buying committees: GPCTBA/C&I or CHAMP provide buyer-centric qualification without excessive complexity.
- Enterprise with long sales cycles: MEDDIC's thoroughness pays off when deals are large and complex.
Our Recommended Approach
At Upturnly, we use a hybrid approach that takes the best of each framework:
- Lead with Challenges: Understand their pain before anything else
- Map the Buying Committee: Identify all stakeholders early
- Quantify the Impact: Connect your solution to measurable outcomes
- Understand Prioritization: Is this a top-3 initiative or a "nice to have"?
- Find Your Champion: Identify who will advocate internally
Let Us Qualify Your Leads
Our lead research team delivers pre-qualified prospects who match your ideal customer profile and are ready to engage.
Book a Free Strategy Call